

Join a thriving global dating community.
Enjoy all features at no cost.
Your privacy is our top priority.
Sign up and match in seconds.
In today’s online dating environment, users are looking for platforms that enable meaningful engagement and authentic chemistry. Hullo uses AI-driven matchmaking, behavioural insights, and First Voice interactions to help users form genuine connections. Noondate focuses on providing users with one carefully selected match per day, emphasising slow dating and thoughtful introductions for those seeking serious relationships. According to a 2025 Global Online Dating Trends Report, over 68% of young adults now prefer apps that prioritise emotional depth, personality, and compatibility over casual swiping. “Hullo’s AI-powered and voice-first features allow users to connect based on personality and intent, creating deeper and more compatible relationships,” says Dr. Rachel Tan, digital relationships researcher at the University of Melbourne. “Noondate encourages users to slow down and focus on meaningful daily connections, promoting thoughtful and deliberate dating experiences,” explains Dr. Emily Zhao, relationship behaviour expert at the University of Hong Kong. If you are deciding between AI-driven voice-based matchmaking and slow, curated daily matches, this comparison will help you choose the app that best aligns with your relationship goals.
Find nearby, Meet Singles Chat
Hullo Dating Ltd
Only for iPhone
5.3M cumulative sign-ups
Mozzet Co., Ltd.
Only for iPhone
out of 5
Miễn phí nhiều, dịch cụ rẻ hơn các app khác nhiều
Lỡ quên gia hạn yêu cầu hoàn tiền không hoànNgay ngày gia hạn nhầm cũng không hoàn app làm ăn chán các app khác người ta vẫn hoàn cho bình thường quá tệ
Rất thông minh và tiện ích
Ok
out of 5
Overwrought with micro-transactions make it prohibitive. UX is also terribly clunky. Notifications that are mostly low-impact are incessant. I have to keep em off even as a man on a platform like this. Would be more active if there was a simplified pay wall and if they weaned down their feature set. It’s just an over abundance of knick knacks and lack of opportunities for actual interaction. It has an advantage over the Korean expat community and is frankly wasting it. Y’all need a UX overall, and I mean this constructively. Do some benchmarking and adapt! Frankly, though, somehow on the better side of Korean dating apps. At least it isn’t overtly problematic.I should mention I have met and talked to a few nice people through this app, so it’s not for some butthurt. I sincerely would like this app to just be better for their sake and their users who have few options in terms of what they’re looking for.
As a woman of mixed origin, I’ve found Noondate to be a refreshing and genuinely welcoming dating app especially for those of us interested in meeting men from Asia or connecting across cultures. What immediately stood out to me is how intentional the app feels. It’s not just about swiping endlessly; it encourages real conversations and meaningful connections.I truly appreciate the cultural diversity on Noondate. The app makes it easier to meet people who value heritage, family, and tradition, while still being open-minded and modern. As someone who values cross-cultural understanding, it’s been nice to connect with men who are proud of their roots and curious about mine as well.Another great aspect is the overall tone of the community. The interactions feel more respectful and genuine compared to many mainstream dating apps. Conversations tend to start with real interest rather than surface-level comments, which makes a big difference if you’re looking for something beyond casual chatting.
The overall app experience is great the interface is clean, smooth, and easy to use. However, the biggest issue (and the reason for my 2-star rating) is the paywall around basic communication. Having to pay just to talk to someone, and paying per conversation or per like,completely kills the whole point of using a dating app.For an app that advertises 3.5 million sign-ups, it’s disappointing that messaging isn’t free. Apps like Hinge, Tinder, and Tantan let people actually talk to each other without charging for every interaction. If you want to offer premium boosts or paid perks like higher visibility, cool, that makes sense. But charging users just to communicate feels excessive and makes the experience frustrating instead of fun.Please reconsider this model. Let people message for free and use add-on features for revenue instead. The app could be great, but the current system is holding it back.
After a week of usage, I noticed it is not equally treating male/female. Males must spend more candies(money) to reach out others. Females only pay 1 to view profile when males pay 5, 5 to send a message for females while it costs 20 for males to send message.However, there is an alternative way to find mates (of course takes a longer time).I really do not like how the app treats each gender differently, but at least you could make some friends.Most of the users reside in Korea, but I hope more users in USA would use this more so it becomes really useful to find a mate.
Hullo focuses on AI-driven matchmaking and voice-based interactions, while Noondate emphasizes slow dating with one curated match per day.
Yes, with First Voice, you can hear someone’s voice before sending messages, making conversations more natural.
Popular features include AI-curated matchmaking, First Voice, verified profiles, and location-based search